Pragmatism of the Proportionality Method in Legal Argumentation in the Contact of Interests

In jurisprudence (national and international), various relevant mechanisms methods have been developed, in particular matters of human rights, proportionality (proportionality) is used to determine the admissibility restricting rights. Today, principle answers a significant number law enforcement questions about these restrictions, however, there no single methodology for mechanism its implementation reasons, presence different applying leaves room criticism. The article discusses approaches proportionality, including: an institutional material approach, value approach that recognizes weighting interests, actual allows you visually assess justification, particular, restrictions on rights from standpoint benefits costs, method determining interests through categorization, based harmonization occurs by defining boundaries which they are implemented. A variety suggests today it necessary study pragmatism legal argumentation confrontation interests. concludes test best tool pragmatization, translating values as rather abstract phenomena into facts.